Using AI isn't wrecking the planet any more than your Netflix binge. Let's stop the fear mongering.

← Back to Unfiltered

Open your feed and somebody's telling you AI is boiling the oceans. Scroll a little more and somebody else swears it's rotting your brain.

And you keep scrolling anyway. Forty-five more minutes. Now it's 11 PM, you're in the dark, and you're streaming video from a data center.

I'll wait while you think about the irony.

Here's my hot take: for the way most of us actually use it, day to day, in a business, AI is not going to hurt the planet any more than our Netflix binge or late-night doomscroll. It might actually be a lot less. Let's look at the numbers instead of the vibes.

Let's do the math (and not the “girl math” kind)

Girl math says it's free if it's on your mom's login. This is real math. Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist, and I don't go this hard on data for fun (that is my husband with his fancy Masters degree in Data Analytics, lol). I had my AI assistant dig up the numbers, and every one links to where it came from.

What you did	Energy	Where it comes from
One text prompt to Gemini	0.24 Wh	Google, via CBS News
One ChatGPT text query	about 0.3 Wh	Epoch AI estimate
100 prompts in a busy workday	about 24 to 30 Wh	Math from the two rows above
One hour of streaming video	about 77 Wh	IEA estimate

Now let's break it down Barney style (crayons out, my military people, IYKYK)

A hundred prompts in a day, which is a LOT for a small business owner, uses about as much energy as 20 minutes of streaming. That's less than one episode of the show you've already watched four times while folding laundry. Your entire day of drafting emails and organizing your to-do list costs less than one rewatch. And the water? Google says a prompt uses about five drops.

Okay, but where do Netflix and TikTok live?

In data centers, the same giant buildings full of servers that run AI. (You'll hear it called “the cloud.”) So they're not a separate problem, they're the same one.

The IEA says data centers used about 1.5% of the world's electricity in 2024, and expects that to more than double by 2030, with AI driving most of the growth (NS Energy on the IEA report). That's real, and I want tech companies to be more open about it, since right now these numbers are self-reported. But that's about how the whole system gets built and powered, not about you asking for a better subject line.

Two honest notes: uploading huge documents or using the “thinking” models costs more per prompt, so be smart with those. And Google says its median prompt got about 33x more efficient in a year, which is encouraging, but more people using it means the total still matters. Keep an eye on it. Don't panic about it.

The real difference: who's driving

People worldwide spend about 141 minutes a day on social media (Statista, Feb 2025). That's the baseline. Nobody's writing panicked think pieces about it anymore because we're all just… used to it. It became normal in 2020 when the world shut down, and now we don't even blink.

Doomscrolling has the receipts: a 2026 meta-analysis of 44 studies links it to more anxiety (r = 0.35), more depression (r = 0.35), and lower well-being (Frontiers in Psychology). Using AI? About half of US adults use chatbots, mostly for searching and work tasks (Pew). And when 453 professionals did a real writing task, the ChatGPT group finished about 40% faster with higher-rated work (Science, 2023).

	Doomscrolling	Using AI on purpose
Who's driving	The feed	You
Has an end point	No, it's built not to	Yes, the task is done
What people mostly use it for	Killing time, staying “informed”	Searching, work tasks (Pew)
What the research links it to	More anxiety and depression, lower well-being	40% faster, 18% higher-rated work in one controlled experiment
What you walk away with	A knot in your stomach	A finished draft, a plan, an answer

One of these is built to keep you there. The other one you close when you're done.

The 3-question test (steal it)

I'm an ADHD brain that dives into rabbit holes face first, so I know exactly what it feels like to lose an hour to a screen. Before I decide if something's good or bad for me, I ask:

Who's driving? Did I open it with a task, or did my thumb find it? AI is the assistant. I'm the boss. A feed is the boss, and I'm the product.
Is there an end? A good AI session ends when the thing is done. If I can't name what “done” looks like, I'm scrolling with extra steps.
How do I feel after? Lighter and more capable, or wired and behind? Your body tells the truth faster than any study.

Pass all three and you don't owe anybody an apology. Keep your hands on the wheel, edit the draft, use your own voice. That's how I teach it.

So, here's the deal

Skipping AI out of guilt just means writing follow-ups at 9 PM and then doomscrolling at 11 because you're fried. Or you use it on purpose: pick the task, stay in charge, close the tab, go live your life.

Want help figuring out where AI fits in your business (and where it absolutely doesn't)? Email me at hello@unchaotically.com or book a free discovery call. No pressure, no pitch-slap.

Book a discovery call

Use the tool. Keep your brain. Stop scrolling at 11.

Using AI isn’t wrecking the planet any more than your Netflix binge. Let’s stop the fear mongering.